Humor & Insight from a Collegiate Cyclist
Velo Quips Get in Touch

What I learned from getting dropped on every climb last weekend

Last weekend began with the confidence that usually arrives after checking the weather forecast twice and choosing the lighter jersey. The ride looked manageable on paper: a familiar loop, a friendly bunch, and several climbs that I had ridden often enough to recognise by their potholes. By the end, I had been detached on every rise long enough to learn the names of several roadside trees.

Being dropped once can be explained away. A badly timed gel, a blocked nose, a mechanical problem, or a moment spent admiring the scenery can create a gap. Being dropped on every climb is more educational. It removes the convenient stories and leaves a fairly direct message: the way I was riding uphill did not match the demands of the ride.

The result was humbling, but it was also useful. The climbs revealed problems with pacing, preparation, positioning and confidence. They also showed why a group ride is such an effective testing ground. A power number from an indoor session can tell me what I can produce in controlled conditions; a Saturday bunch tells me whether I can repeat that effort after a fast corner, a conversation, a headwind and three previous accelerations.

The first lesson was pacing, not fitness

My first mistake happened before the first climb started. The bunch was moving quickly along the flat, and I treated every small acceleration as an obligation. When the pace lifted out of a roundabout, I closed the gap immediately. When a rider moved around a parked car, I followed the surge. When the group rolled through a suburban rise, I pressed harder instead of preserving energy.

This is classic group-ride impatience. The effort feels manageable because it lasts only a few seconds, yet those seconds accumulate. By the time the road tilted upwards, I had already spent too much of my limited supply of sharp efforts. The climb then became a test of depleted legs rather than a clean assessment of climbing fitness.

I also started each ascent too quickly. Seeing the front riders move away triggered the familiar instinct to chase before the gradient had properly settled. I would ride above my sustainable threshold for a minute, realise the gap was not closing, and then lose far more time when the effort collapsed. A steadier opening pace would have kept me closer for longer and made the final third less dramatic.

The practical lesson is simple enough to remember and difficult enough to practise: ride the climb you are on, not the climb you fear. The fastest riders were not making every rise look easy by accident. They were controlling their effort while I was repeatedly borrowing energy from the next kilometre.

A climb exposes every weak decision

Climbing magnifies small errors because gravity charges interest. A poor gear choice becomes a grinding cadence. A weak position becomes a long chase. A missed drink becomes a dry mouth and a rising sense of panic. On the flatter sections, I could hide these problems in the slipstream. On a climb, there was nowhere to disguise them.

My cadence fell whenever the gradient changed. Instead of shifting early, I stayed in a gear that felt respectable for a few seconds and then stood up to force the pedals around. That movement looked aggressive but was inefficient. The repeated surges raised my heart rate, disrupted my breathing and left me unable to respond when the road steepened again.

There was a handling issue, too. I was sitting too far back in the bunch before the climbs, partly because I did not want to appear eager and partly because I underestimated how quickly the group would stretch. By the time I reached the lower slopes, I was already behind stronger riders. Even if I had possessed the same climbing power, I would have needed extra effort simply to maintain contact.

Small choices that became large gaps

On Australian roads, this positioning matters more than many riders admit. A climb outside Melbourne can begin after a long series of traffic lights and rolling lanes, while a Sydney route may deliver a sharp ramp with little warning. A bunch that seems relaxed on the flat can become a single-file line within seconds. Arriving at the bottom near the front is a form of energy management, not an attempt to show off.

I had treated the climb as the main event and the approach as irrelevant. The stronger riders treated the approach as part of the climb. That difference alone explained a great deal of the gap.

Group rides are a laboratory

A solo climb gives clean feedback. A group ride gives messy feedback, which is often more valuable. It reveals how I respond when the pace changes without warning, when someone attacks from the wrong side of the road, or when I need to eat while holding a wheel. The conditions are less tidy, yet they resemble actual riding far more closely.

I noticed that my problem was not simply a lack of maximum power. I could produce a decent effort for a short rise, especially when the gradient was familiar. The real weakness was repeatability. Each climb required a hard acceleration after a section of fast riding, and I could not reproduce the same output four or five times in one session.

That distinction changes the training target. If I only chase a better five-minute number, I may become good at one heroic climb while remaining poor at a route containing eight ordinary ones. My weekend exposed a need for repeated sub-threshold efforts, recovery while still moving, and enough endurance to make sensible decisions late in the ride.

The bunch also exposed a mental habit: I interpret a small gap as a crisis. Once the wheel in front moved two bike lengths away, I sprinted instead of checking whether the group had actually settled. That reaction cost energy and often turned a manageable gap into an impossible one. Learning to close gaps gradually should be part of my riding education alongside intervals and strength work.

What the ride revealed beyond raw speed

This is where local riding culture can help. Melbourne bunches often value a steady rotation and predictable turns, while many Sydney groups have to manage sharper terrain and more frequent interruptions from traffic. Brisbane riders may be dealing with heat and humidity before the first serious hill appears. Each environment rewards a slightly different kind of preparation, but all of them punish riders who mistake one good effort for full-day resilience.

The ride did not prove that I am incapable of climbing. It showed that my current fitness is poorly matched to the rhythm of the rides I want to join. That is a much more useful diagnosis.

Training needs a local weather setting

My recent training had been too comfortable. I had completed several indoor sessions where the resistance was consistent, the water bottle was within reach and the fan created an artificial breeze. Those workouts had value, but they gave me a false sense of readiness for a warm Australian morning with no controlled pauses.

The temperature was not extreme by Brisbane standards, yet the humidity made every effort feel sticky. In Adelaide or Melbourne, the same ride might have been limited by cold fingers, a sharp wind or an early start that required arm warmers. Winter cycling has its own performance cost: extra layers, slower warm-ups and a greater temptation to skip the first hard effort until the body feels ready.

I also under-ate. My breakfast was sensible but too small for the duration and intensity, and I delayed the first carbohydrate intake because I was trying to drink only when thirsty and eat only when hungry. Those signals arrived too late. Once the climbs began, I had to choose between holding the wheel and reaching for a bar, and neither option felt particularly successful.

The Australian bike market adds another practical consideration. Quality winter kit, tyres and replacement parts can be expensive, especially when local stock is limited and a rider is tempted to postpone maintenance. My rear tyre was legal but worn, and the slightly soft feel did not help on rough climbs. Equipment was not the main reason I was dropped, though it contributed to the general sense that I had arrived underprepared.

Better preparation for the next hilly ride

One training idea I have now rejected is copying every fashionable claim without checking whether it solves my problem. A piece discussing the pros and cons of training barefoot may be interesting in a general fitness conversation, but barefoot work would not fix my poor pacing, under-fuelling or limited repeatability on a road bike. Specific problems deserve specific interventions.

The next block will include outdoor climbs, controlled starts and longer rides where I practise fuelling before I feel desperate. I will still use the indoor trainer, especially when Melbourne weather turns cold and wet, but it needs to support outdoor performance rather than replace it.

Getting dropped can still produce useful data

There is a particular embarrassment in watching a bunch crest a climb while you are still negotiating the final hairpin. It is easy to turn that moment into a verdict about talent. I spent a few minutes doing exactly that, imagining that everyone else had discovered some secret climbing gene while I had been issued a bicycle with an administrative error.

That story was entertaining but inaccurate. Several riders who disappeared from view on the steepest sections were caught later on the flatter roads. Some had strong climbing legs but weaker descending confidence. Others were excellent at repeated surges and less comfortable riding into a headwind. The group was not divided into climbers and non-climbers; it contained different strengths that appeared at different points in the route.

I began paying closer attention to body language once I accepted that I was observing rather than competing. A rider who sat upright, stopped talking and shifted towards the edge of the saddle was probably reaching a limit. Another who kept a relaxed upper body and changed cadence smoothly looked far more comfortable, even at the same speed. Reading those signals can help with pacing and positioning, which is why this guide to rider body language belongs in every discussion of late-race observation.

The broader lesson is that being dropped changes the information available to you. From the rear, I could see how the front riders prepared for a rise, how gaps formed, and which accelerations were genuine attacks rather than ordinary bunch movement. It was painful data, but still data.

I have set a more useful standard for the next month. Success will mean staying controlled on the first climb, eating before the second, and finishing the final ascent with enough composure to make a decision. If I remain with the group, excellent. If I am dropped after executing the plan, the result will still tell me something clear about fitness.

The next step is to find rides that match this process rather than hiding from difficult terrain. LetsRide.co can help locate local group rides and cycling events across Australian cities, giving me a better way to choose a bunch with the right distance, climbing and pace. I will return to the hills with a smaller ego, a better breakfast and a much more deliberate gear choice.